Now we’re taking a more bipartisan route. See? We listened we pulled the controversial pick. In any case, by pulling Chipman from the running himself, the president gets some solid political points to put behind his next nominee. Though the White House is allegedly making this call after considering the push back based on Chipman’s history, that’s no guarantee the next nominee will be more moderate – though he or she certainly could be.
As bad as Chipman looked for the Second Amendment, it’s always possible the president could pick someone even worse.
The remaining question is who Biden will name next. Indeed, now that it’s in the news, it will likely be sooner rather than later. It’s unclear as of yet when the nomination will be officially withdrawn, but the sources close to the issue who informed the media claim it could be as early as this week. Team Biden, it seems, has opted for the path of least resistance. With at least three votes shy of a tie, the choices were limited: Force a vote in which the nomination will almost certainly be denied or pull the guy and start over. Jon Tester (D-MT) also never offered his support, and Angus King of Maine – an independent who typically votes Democrat – openly said that he did not support the nominee. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) might have been the obvious guess, as he has proven a roadblock to the party taking several other partisan actions, but he isn’t alone. But not only does every Republican senator oppose him, three other senators still have yet to get behind him. With a 50-50 split in the Senate and a Democrat VP to break the tie, Chipman’s confirmation could have been a cake walk. Thanks to Harry Reid’s 2013 decision to go nuclear on all federal confirmations other than those to the Supreme Court, a simple majority is all Biden needed to get his guy in office. Now there’s a new one, and it’s the catchall third rail, especially in the Democratic Party: racism.” Chipman’s Opposition explained: “There were plenty of reasons for Democrats who aren’t hostile to the Second Amendment to vote no previously. As Liberty Nation Legal Affairs Editor Scott D. If that weren’t enough to deny Chipman the job – and for most Republicans and even some Democrats, it was – allegations of racism during his time as an ATF agent were exposed during the confirmation hearing. That’s a terrifying resume for the guy picked to lead the nation’s enforcer and, often, interpreter of firearms laws.Īdditionally, Chipman’s disgust for the armed citizen has been made crystal clear by numerous comments immortalized by the internet. Don’t let the names fool you – these groups have little to do with saving lives and are entirely dedicated to stripping the people of the right to keep and bear arms. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)Īfter the nominee left the ATF, he worked with anti-firearm advocacies like Mayors Against Illegal Guns, Moms Demand Action, Everytown for Gun Safety, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, the Joyce Foundation, the Center for American Progress, Americans for Responsible Solutions, and Giffords: Courage to Fight Gun Violence.
0 kommentar(er)
